[mac4theblind] Re: routers that are accessible?

  • From: Richard Ring <richring@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: mac4theblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:25:24 -0500

Thanks! You've given me quite a bit of food for thought! A banquet, actually. 
Truly appreciate your help!

You can have an off day, but you can't have a day off! ---The Art of Fielding
 Sent from my Mac Book Pro 
richring@xxxxxxxxx

On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Scott Granados <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> You can do this a few ways alluded to by Isaac and others.
> 
> First, the basics, make sure your Airport extreme is placed as high up as 
> possible and as open as possible.  Don't obstruct it with other equipment for 
> example.
>       Also, very important, try another channel.  Remember that 6 is the most 
> commonly used with 11 being the next most common, try channel 1 first then 
> 11.  If you use channels like 2 - 5 or 7 -10 etc they will per lap with other 
> devices on 1 - 6 or 11 or other combinations so you might have overlap from a 
> neighbor causing a problem.  Pic one of the main 3 to avoid random 
> overlapping on parts of the spectrum.  Auto mode can be flawed so if you have 
> auto set by all means try a manual channel setting.
>       That out of the way, if you still have a range problem and you might as 
> David mentioned it depends on the type of walls and building materials etc.  
> You also might have a Microwave or garage door opener, cordless phone, etc 
> that is interfering.  You can approach the problem a few ways.  You could run 
> a wire somewhere closer and place another access point.  You could rome 
> between them as needed or your stationary computers will pick the closest / 
> best received AP.  This requires running a physical router from your router 
> to the point where the AP would be installed.  Access points can be had 
> inexpensively either by purchasing another airport extreme or some other less 
> expensive AP only.  (DLINK DAP series, Netgear AP series, etc.
>       Next, you could use a repeater.  802.11N Repeaters can be had for as 
> low as $50 and many access points have this function built in.  Here you join 
> the repeater to your main SSID, place it somewhere in the middle and your far 
> end machines join the repeated SSID.  These work pretty well.
>       Another really good way to go is use a better wireless bridge instead 
> of the stock wireless card in your laptop / desk top.  You can get these for 
> $50 on up and they allow you to join an SSID and have an ethernet port to 
> plug in to.  The bridge has a better antenna and radio and also has the 
> advantage of being able to be placed high in your room where service is 
> required.  I use a lot of these.  The link sys WET600N isn't bad, the 
> Ubiquiti Nano Series for real long runs or Air router series for in home use 
> work very well.
>       Finally, you could use a better wireless adapter.  Something that 
> attaches USB side to your computer and again you can place around the room.  
> These have better radios than the standard broadcomm or Intel chips included 
> and many times have advanced features for long runs.  
>       Some combination of this should work for you.  Start out with the free 
> stuff and go from there.  Depending on the budget you can decide what 
> solution to use.  In my house I have 4 access points, one in each corner far 
> room hard wired back to a central switch and set up to allow for roaming 
> access.  I also have a long range AP outside that I can pick up about a mile 
> or so from the house.  Just depends on what you want to spend.
> 
> Hope that helps.
> 
> 
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Richard Ring <richring@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I have a question, and, Scott, you seem to be the one who will be able to 
>> answer it. Is there any way to boost the signal on an Apple Airport Extreme? 
>> I broadcast an Internet radio show, and I find myself buffering. My 
>> housemate also broadcasts using the same server, and she never buffers at 
>> all. Any ideas?
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> You can have an off day, but you can't have a day off! ---The Art of Fielding
>>  Sent from my Mac Book Pro 
>> richring@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Scott Granados <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> The big problem with net gear is the forwarding rate.
>>> 
>>> Let's use an example to illustrate what  I mean.
>>> 
>>> Let's say you have a 100 megabit internet connection and you attach a 
>>> Netgear something like an FW308 or insett your router here.  Of that 100 
>>> megabits, you'll be lucky to actually be able to use 20.  This is because 
>>> the processor used for forwarding decisions in the router is under powered 
>>> for today's high speed connections.  Linksys is even worse at this with the 
>>> same setup yielding 4 to 6 megabits instead of the full 100.
>>> You could literally swap your net gear with a faster say DLink or as 
>>> mentioned Apple Extreme and you'll feel like you have a whole new, faster 
>>> connection.
>>> 
>>> Netgear is definitely not the worst, Linksys / Cisco hold that honor but 
>>> it'd definitely not as fast as you probably need.  CHeck around if you find 
>>> something that fits your price point give it a shot.  Netgear is fine on 
>>> the reliability side just performance is lacking.  GO with what you like 
>>> though, the good news is most hardware is accessible now so you should do 
>>> well with what ever you select.  GOod luck and enjoy.
>>> 
>>> Scott
>>> 
>>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:18 AM, David Hilbert Poehlman 
>>> <poehlman1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Scott,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the info.
>>>> 
>>>> My last net gear router lasted over five years.  It is totally accessible 
>>>> at least on the mac.  According to my reading, net gear is a top rated 
>>>> brand among consumers like me.
>>>> 
>>>> I did research before buying but did not find info on accessibility.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Scott Granados <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I would stay away from net gear but I base that on reliability and 
>>>> forwarding rate, not accessibility.
>>>> 
>>>> In my mind on the consumer side the DLink DIR series is excellent and 
>>>> forwards at line rate.  I use an 857 dual band router but I believe they 
>>>> are up to the 865 now.
>>>>    Other routers that are good both from a performance and accessibility 
>>>> standpoint are the Ubiquiti Air Router or Air Router HP, Sonic Wall TZ 
>>>> series or Edge Water.  DLink is my favorite though and has always treated 
>>>> me well.
>>>> 
>>>> Hope that helps.
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 8:33 AM, David Hilbert Poehlman 
>>>> <poehlman1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> All,
>>>>> 
>>>>> For various reasons, I've ordered the following router.
>>>>> NETGEAR N750 Dual Band Wi-Fi Gigabit Router (WNDR4300)
>>>>> from amazon for $99.97 with free shipping.
>>>>> Is this or any other router besides apple's accessible through web on the 
>>>>> mac?
>>>>> If this one is not accessible, which is? and if this is accessible or any 
>>>>> other router is can it do all we need to do with it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suppose I could have gotten a new version of my old router which is 
>>>>> failing, but like this one so went with it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for any help.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Jonnie Appleseed
>>>>> With His
>>>>> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
>>>>> touching the internet
>>>>> Reducing Technology's disabilities
>>>>> One Byte At a time
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jonnie Appleseed
>>>> With His
>>>> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
>>>> touching the internet
>>>> Reducing Technology's disabilities
>>>> One Byte At a time
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Other related posts: