Well, to say that a book contains profanity (the word I couldn't think of before of before or explicit sex or violence or torture obscenities is stating facts rather than opinion--though I admit that "strong language might be opinion. smile. Putting these in the synopsis is preferable, I think. I use the review for expressing my opinion as to whether the book is we ell-written or, is perhaps outlandish but worth reading or is dull--that sort of thing Cindy Wish List (i.e., books wanted added to the collection) and books-being-scanned list available at sites below Wish List: https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/Bookshare+Wish+List Books Being Scanned List: https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/Books+Being+Scanned+List --- On Sat, 3/27/10, Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: more books by Elie Weisel > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Saturday, March 27, 2010, 5:46 PM > It would work for me. Like I said, I > am all for the disemination of information and such labels > would be informational, not an imposition. Admittedly, I > might be a bit perplexed if a book is labeled as containing > strong language and I read it and find myself asking where > is the strong language. That has happened to me on several > occasions with NLS books. That is why I tend to think that > such labels belong in the reviews section. That is where > opinions belong. In fact, if you look up a book entitled > "When Wizards Rule" you will find that I wrote a review that > amounts to -- even if I was not thinking of it that way when > I wrote it -- a label that the book contains explicit > descriptions of sex. > > > _ _ _ > > "As a woman I have no country. As a woman my country is the > world" > Virginia Woolf > > The Militant: > http://www.themilitant.com > Pathfinder Press: > http://www.pathfinderpress.com > Granma International: > http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html > ----- Original Message ----- From: "gwen tweedy" <gstweedy@xxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 7:50 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: more books by > Elie Weisel > > > > I didn't think of that. > > Couldn't they take the adult content off altogether > and just put the little labels on there the tags of what is > in them and not rate them would that work? > > Gwen > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Melissa Smith" > <mdsmith25@xxxxxxxx> > > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 5:17 PM > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: more > books by Elie Weisel > > > > > >> The reason many consider it censorship is that, > only those over 18 are able to download the books marked > adult content. There are some books, or so I've heard, that > are marked adult content, but are required reading for high > school students. Most high school students aren't over 18, > and therefore, couldn't download the books. When I was in > high school, I read several books that could be marked as > having adult content. > >> > >> Melissa Smith > >> > >> > >> On 3/27/2010 4:10 PM, gwen tweedy wrote: > >>> But I'm not talking about Censorship, in > fact it wouldn't be censorship at all. > >>> It would just be telling about the > language content or other in the book. It > wouldn't mean a person couldn't read it, nor would it mean > anyone was trying to stop them from reading it. > >>> It would just mean if a person didn't want to > stumble upon it, they wouldn't need to that is all. > >>> To me there is no censorship to it. > >>> Because it's not telling you can nor can't, > nor is it barring any books. > >>> It's simply a designation for those who feel > more comfortable knowing fully what they are down loading. > >>> TV says PG-13 R G and on it goes, does that > mean people don't watch the shows oh and I forgot X-rating > in movies or shows, does that mean folks don't nor can't > watch them. > >>> Certainly not, a body can do what a person > wants and likes, it is simply a label designation. > >>> It doesn't mean a person can, nor a person > can't! It means absolutely nothing, except a designation. > >>> I guess I don't feel that is censorship. > >>> If you were told what to do and not to do, if > the head here said no no we can't have this or that book up, > then you'd have real reason to call it censorship, because > then they would be squelching your rights as you would see > them. > >>> But no one has done that, nor will they. > >>> It is the same access to the same books no > lock and key, just simply letters for those who wish to know > what is in it. > >>> Nothing more, nothing less no censorship > involved. > >>> Gwen > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger > Loran Bailey" <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> > >>> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 12:29 PM > >>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: > more books by Elie Weisel > >>> > >>> > >>>> Bingo! And I am one of those who does not > check it for anything., As far as I am concerned it is > completely unjustified to prohibit anyone from reading > anything he or she wants because of status. Can you imagine > it if some self appointed member of the morality police > decided that people who are blind should not be allowed to > read certain things because it happens to offend that > morality policeman's sensibilities without regard to how the > blind person might feel about it? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _ _ > _ > >>>> > >>>> "As a woman I have no country. As a woman > my country is the world" > >>>> Virginia Woolf > >>>> > >>>> The Militant: > >>>> http://www.themilitant.com > >>>> Pathfinder Press: > >>>> http://www.pathfinderpress.com > >>>> Granma International: > >>>> http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: > "Melissa Smith" <mdsmith25@xxxxxxxx> > >>>> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:02 AM > >>>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish > list: more books by Elie Weisel > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> The reason that the designation > doesn't make a lot of sense, is that the proofer can uncheck > or check the adult content designation. Many feel that the > adult content is a form of censorship, and don't check it > for anything. > >>>>> > >>>>> Melissa Smith > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 3/27/2010 1:32 AM, John J. Boyer > wrote: > >>>>>> It is easy for anyone to download > books that are full of sex scenes, and > >>>>>> not even "nice" sex. I've been > disappointed by some books of Robert > >>>>>> Heinlein. Any child can download > these. I'll probably change my setting > >>>>>> to include "adult" books, since > the designation seems not to make much > >>>>>> sense. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> John > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:25:23AM > -0500, Valerie Maples wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Someone told us that there is > an actual standard because of the grant that rates books > based on word frequencies and situations that cause them to > generate the adult material designation. I do believe the F. > word is one of the ones that is considered serious and is an > automatic designation. A series of moderate occurrences can > also generate the adult designation. It makes sense that > there would be a criterion with so many books being > available to young readers so that it would remove > accidental inappropriate downloads. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Having said that, apparently > there were a couple of books that could find no reason for > those designations, those they allowed a proofreader to > remove it if there was absolutely no risk to young readers. > I'm not trying to start a controversy here, just state what > I was told how the adult designation came to be utilized. As > a parent, even though Nichole is not completely independent > in downloading, I am grateful that there is some boundary. > It is easy enough for a child to get an exemption with > parental approval. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Valerie > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:59 PM, > Jamie Yates, CPhT wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Some books get marked as > adult because the proofreader finds the material to be very > sensitive. I only mark books adult if they are sexually > graphic but often Bookshare takes and marks my books adult > for me. I find the Penny Warner books about the small town > newspaper reporter who is deaf always get marked adult > because she is fond of the f word. Her sex scenes are always > very very very bland so it isn't the few and far between sex > scenes, it has to be her colorful language. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I've scanned many other > books which Bookshare automatically marked adult and as the > scanner I cannot unmark it. Only the proofreader can do it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'm told that many Elie > Weisel books are now required reading in high schools these > days so probably Bookshare should be made aware of the > situation so they can assess it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> To > unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > >>>>>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by > itself in the subject line. To get a list of available > commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject > line. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a > blank Email to > >>>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself > in the subject line. To get a list of available > commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject > line. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank > Email to > >>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in > the subject line. To get a list of available commands, > put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank > Email to > >>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > subject line. To get a list of available commands, put > the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > >>> > >>> > >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email > to > >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > subject line. To get a list of available commands, put > the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > >> > >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of available commands, put the > word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of available commands, put the > word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.