[bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're validating
- From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:16:34 -0700
Hi, Jake. Now, that would be a good idea, having an email warning a day or
so before your book returns to the downloads page. Yes, I agree, too, that a
lot of the work *should* rest with the submitters, but then, there are many
validators who do a wonderful job fixing up books that should have been
fixed up by the submitter but weren't. It's because of them that those books
are more of a pleasure to read than a chore, as they would be, no doubt, if
some of them were submitted and approved as is. Take care.
Julie Morales
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: mercy0421
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jake Brownell" <jabrown@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:33 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're validating
Jill,
Validation of course is still meant to be a task that doesn't take that
long. Striving for perfection can push the task past its original intended
goal and thus the time limit.
Renewing a book doesn't take but a minute to do. As well if a volunteer
decides not to complete a book and is a newbie or simply forgets, then the
book spends less time languishing on that volunteers Step 2 page.
BookShare's main goal is to be a timely publication service, not another
slow one.
I think perhaps a better suggestion is to have an email generated warning
the user of the books pending experation. Such an email would give
volunteers time to renew the book rather than having the notice go out when
the book returns to step 1.
As a final note I thinkt the amount of credit a validation is worth attempts
to show how the step is to be performed. (I'm not saying anything against
those of you who go above and beyond the call of duty when validating, I'm
just noting how the step was intended).
Best,
Jake
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jill O'Connell" <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 10:40 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're validating
> I have suggested to Bookshare that validation time be two weeks instead of
> one. Hopefully if those validating weren't so rushed they could do a
better
> job than we sometimes see. Of course, we can renew but that in itself is
> time consuming. What do the rest of you think?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 10:13 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] renewing books you're validating
>
>
> > Rose's post of a while ago made me tremember that the
> > same thing happened to me when I first started
> > validating. So I thought, for the newbies, I'd mention
> > this: If you count seven *including* the day you
> > download or renew, your book(s) will be renewed and
> > not released. Also, you can renew them a day or two
> > sooner if you want. And you can renew after midnight
> > on day six, which is the 7th day. I usually do that so
> > I have the book longer, though since we can keep on
> > renewing it doesn't really matter much.
> >
> > HTH
> > Cindy
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.336 / Virus Database: 267.8.16/50 - Release Date: 7/15/2005
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.0/50 - Release Date: 7/16/2005
>
>
Other related posts:
