Hello All again, although I though I have finished for the day. Yet I am
compelled to make an observation about “inexperienced representatives”. I
feel it is a very big call to dismiss any contribution in the field.
“Inexperienced representatives” ARE part of the field. It is our challenge
to sense and understand what they are saying, why and what is the driving
force behind their statements. It is our own entanglement that is the
hardest to deal with.
Best wishes to all,
Robert
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Leslie Nipps lnipps@xxxxxxxxx
[ConstellationTalk] <ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, I agree, and to muddy the water a little…;-)
Inexperienced representatives often want to contribute ideas that don’t
come from the Field but are their preconceived notions of how it should
unfold, or out of a desire to be “helpful.” I often find it necessary to
gently, kindly, but firmly interrupt these contributions because they only
deepen the present state of the system’s disorder, and it takes even more
energy to move forward when we spend time in “helpful” ideas that don’t
widen our frame. Obviously, this needs to be done respectfully, but I do
feel that sometimes firmness and authority are really needed.
And, of course, there is the deeper discernment to tell the difference
between the two…
Peace, Leslie
The Rev. Leslie Nipps
NLP & Family Constellations Practititoner
“Trust as a Way of Life…”
leslie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 4, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Robert Grant erebees@xxxxxxxxx
[ConstellationTalk] <ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Friends,
“I felt that I had interrupted a process that I should have allowed out of
a concept about forgiveness as opposed to out of something that arose from
within the field.“
Yes, I feel very strongly that the above statement highlights perhaps one
of the greatest challenge in the evolution of the constellation method. All
too often I witness facilitators falling into the trap of “knowing better”
rather than allowing the field to guide them in constellation. And I mean
the whole field, all those present in the room, client and representative
in equal measure.
I find participating in peer practice groups very helpful where there is
openness to discuss our differing approaches and learn from one an other
without the distorting effects of ego, unawareness, financial imperatives
and facilitator authority.
Best wishes to all,
Robert
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Alison Fornes maitreya71@xxxxxxxxx
[ConstellationTalk] <ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In a Constellation not long ago that I facilitated, the representative
for the client's brother suddenly felt a rising up and said either, "I'm
sorry" or "forgive me". I did my facilitator thing and interrupted him.
While I don't recall the specifics of what happened next, and the
constellation was rich and powerful and healing, what stayed with me
were questions about why I interrupted him.
When I processed with the client afterwards and we spoke about that
moment, she said that she felt a great surge of emotion, for this was
the he first time she had heard anything that suggested a recognition
of the pain he caused her. I felt that I had interrupted a process that I
should have allowed out of a concept about forgiveness as opposed to out
of something that arose from within the field.
I certainly resonate with these posts and the need to be truly present
for seeing, feeling and honoring the pain that is present. But isn't there
also a space for deep sorrow, regret?
As I write, I notice my own answer emerges. Seeing the constant rise and
fall different aspects, no end point. "I am sorry", "forgive me", just
another arising in the healing movement. If we as facilitators can hold
each arising moment while still being open to what's next, as opposed to
constricting as I did in that moment, perhaps that is what allows something
truly new to emerge, even for me as a facilitator.
Grateful for this forum to help process it.
With a Sunny Heart,
Alison
