Thanks Dan that makes sense.
Would you or others call noticing the discomfort of the 2 representatives
phenomenological or is that too much of a judgement? If instead I said I
noticed slight squirming in those 2 representatives, would that be
phenomenological? What about noticing my own reactions and internal
sensations in my body - Is that regarded as part of the phenomenological
method?
Hasta la vista
Chris Walsh
Website www.constellationflow.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Booth Cohen
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:33 PM
To: ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ConstellationTalk] phenomenology
We're always in the interplay between formulaic and phenomenological. The
scene you described is more formulaic. It becomes more phenomenological
when you swap them around and they feel worse. Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: On Behalf Of Chris Walsh
Imagine we are facilitating a constellation. We notice 2 representatives who
are standing side by side look quite uncomfortable. We then realise that
according to the orders they are on the wrong side of each other. So we swap
them around. They both sigh and visibly relax so we feel happy with the
intervention.
My current question about this is: What part of this - if any, is
phenomenological?
Hasta la vista
Chris Walsh
Website www.constellationflow.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
