FWIW, it’s not uncommon that I see a constellation movement from someone else,
and find it is a useful movement for a client of mine in a different context. I
like to think the field is sometimes giving us “examples” with which to be
creative and transfer to other contexts. Haven’t we all done that with
“examples” we’ve read about in Hellinger’s and other writers’ works? That’s not
to answer Barbara’s question of the propriety of the movement - we can’t
possibly evaluate that in a short email - just to say that I think we all do
this, rather frequently. And it’s usually a good thing.
I am uncomfortable with this conversation for a load of other reasons, but not
for that one. ;-)
Cheers!
The Rev. Leslie Nipps
Convivium Constellations - Founder, Practitioner & Trainer
“Trust as a Way of Life…”
www.conviviumconstellations.com
"Hasten to that which supports." - The I Ching
On Jun 11, 2017, at 9:01 AM, andystuck@xxxxxxx [ConstellationTalk]
<ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Barbara
Thank the field for you. This constellation talk thing makes me so
uncomfortable for precisely what you just said to Liz I fear it's violation of
this work
Thank you for speaking and being you
Respectfully
Andy
