Far too expensive in my view. I think the circulation of this journal is
a lot less than it was and do not believe it will be at all effective.
Given that we are bulking at spending aprox £150 to put us on the Radio
Player for the month, which I agree is probably not worth it given all
the other ways people can listen, spending this much for a tiny ad for
one or two weeks on something that is so disposable and may be largely
ignored does not make much sense either.
A free article or photo in the Observer is a much better option. It is
far more likely to be seen and read.
Simon.
On 17/04/18 17:32, Steve Apps (Redacted sender jdiamond10045199 for
DMARC) wrote:
Tina and I both agree with Sarah, we think it's too expensive for the
size and for the publicity it will achieve.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tuesday, 17 April 2018 Tony Bell <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Afternoon all,
With tony D in Spain this week, I have made contact with the Friday ad
people, we can have a 1/16^th page ad for 150 quid for one week (there
is a slightly cheaper option if we take a two week ad…). They are
sending me details of art work size and options as we speak. Rick, I
have dropped you a personal mail to see if you are able to produce
some small announcement artwork…..
Deadline for the 27^th Edition is Tuesday of next week….
Here are the fine details of costs:
Front page adverts
1/16 page 6cm by 4.8cm 1 week £150+Vat 2 weeks £260+vat
1/8 page 6cm by 10.3cm 1 week £275+vat 2 Weeks £500+vat
…. But are we all O.k to spend this? I reckon it’s a good broad
spread, and ought to be seen by many people, I would personally go for
a 2 week 1/16^th page option..
Cheers all.
Tony
