[ibis-macro] Re: BIRD 120.1 Question

  • From: "Todd Westerhoff" <twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:23:11 -0400 (EDT)

Arpad,

 

As I remember, reference flow meant "do whatever you like, but the answer
you get had better be the same as if you had done this."

 

A subtle point to be sure, but part of what I remember the intent to be.

 

Todd.

 

Description: cid:EAFF2D52-4B63-4A05-9D24-B96BE375B7E0@eau.wi.charter.com



Todd Westerhoff

VP, Software Products

 

Signal Integrity Software Inc. .  <http://www.sisoft.com/> www.sisoft.com

6 Clock Tower Place . Suite 250 . Maynard, MA 01754

(978) 461-0449 x24  .   <mailto:twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx> twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx

 

 

"Three in the morning and I'm still awake,
So I picked up a pen and a page . "

                                             -Sidewalk Prophets

 

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 1:10 PM
To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: BIRD 120.1 Question

 

Scenario to me means possible situations,

Reference flow to me means "thou shall do

this and that".

 

Arpad

=========================================

 

From: Gregory R Edlund [mailto:gedlund@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:58 AM
To: Muranyi, Arpad
Cc: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ibis-macro] Re: BIRD 120.1 Question

 

Arpad,

I'm not clear yet.  Both sections seem to be describing what's going on
inside of the simulator.  Is there some subtle difference between an
"application scenario" and a "reference flow" that I'm not picking up on?

Greg Edlund
Senior Engineer
Signal Integrity and System Timing
IBM Systems & Technology Group
3605 Hwy. 52 N  Bldg 050-3
Rochester, MN 55901



Inactive hide details for "Muranyi, Arpad" ---03/13/2012 10:40:44
AM---Greg, Section 2 is called APPLICATION SCENARIOS and sect"Muranyi,
Arpad" ---03/13/2012 10:40:44 AM---Greg, Section 2 is called APPLICATION
SCENARIOS and section 3

From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03/13/2012 10:40 AM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: BIRD 120.1 Question
Sent by: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

  _____  




Greg,
 
Section 2 is called APPLICATION SCENARIOS and section 3
is called  Reference Flows.  The first sentence in
section 2 says:
 
| The next two sections provide an overview of the two simulation types
| supported by the IBIS-AMI specification.
 
and the first sentence in section 3 says:
 
| The next two sections define a reference simulation flow for statistical
| and time domain system analysis simulations.
 
Does that answer your question?
 
Thanks,
 
Arpad
=========================================================
 
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gregory R Edlund
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 8:36 AM
To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-macro] BIRD 120.1 Question
  

Can anybody explain the difference between section 2.2 and 3.2 of BIRD
120.1?  Both seem to be describing the high-level process for calculating
a voltage-time waveform from AMI models, a channel, and a bit stream.

Thanks.

Greg Edlund
Senior Engineer
Signal Integrity and System Timing
IBM Systems & Technology Group
3605 Hwy. 52 N  Bldg 050-3
Rochester, MN 55901 

GIF image

GIF image

Other related posts: