[ibis-macro] FW: [ibis-interconn] Re: I agree with Arpad, that we should start by assuming my introductory language and see if it works ...

  • From: Walter Katz <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "IBIS-ATM" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:43:18 -0500 (EST)

All,



This should have gone to IBIS-ATM. I am adding another document that
contains all of the graphic elements in IBIS 6.1 that contain GND or the
ground symbol.



Walter



From: ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2016 8:04 AM
To: IBIS-Interconnect <ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-interconn] Re: I agree with Arpad, that we should start by
assuming my introductory language and see if it works ...



All,



The enclosed document lists all lines (or paragraphs) that contain the
string GND. I eliminated occurrences of "[GND .]" and "GND Pulse .". The
(n): at the beginning of each line is an artifact of the way I did this
extraction, but us useful to identify each GND occurrence.



This does not include GND in graphics and the ground symbol in graphics.
Most of these are resolved by changing the ground symbol to GND and
interpreting them as signal_names.



There are other things we need to look at carefully (like A_GND),



Walter





From: Walter Katz [mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 7:10 AM
To: 'IBIS-Interconnect' <ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
Subject: I agree with Arpad, that we should start by assuming my
introductory language and see if it works ...



All,



To all, a Happy New Year.



I do agree with Arpad's comment in the minutes of the last meeting:



- Arpad: It seems that Walter's proposal was an attempt to define a
general rule

at the outset that could allow us to resolve many issues with one

statement.

- I'm beginning to wonder if it is going to work that way.

- Perhaps we would be better off to start reading the document sentence
by

sentence and hashing out the details for each necessary change. Then,
as we

are doing that, if we run into something that could be generalized up
front

we can add an upfront statement.

- Right now it seems that we've spent two meetings trying to tackle the

generalized concept and still have confusion and or disagreement.



Walter



Walter Katz

<mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx> wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx

Phone 303.449-2308

Mobile 303.335-6156

Attachment: GND.DOCX
Description: MS-Word 2007 document

Attachment: GND_Graphics.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document

Other related posts:

  • » [ibis-macro] FW: [ibis-interconn] Re: I agree with Arpad, that we should start by assuming my introductory language and see if it works ... - Walter Katz