Walter,
Thanks for your efforts in getting this started.
I have a basic question. Did you search strictly for "GND"?
How about when the word is spelled out, like "ground"? Are
there possibly any other spelling variants of ground?
Thanks,
Arpad
=============================================================
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:43 PM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] FW: [ibis-interconn] Re: I agree with Arpad, that we
should start by assuming my introductory language and see if it works ...
All,
This should have gone to IBIS-ATM. I am adding another document that contains
all of the graphic elements in IBIS 6.1 that contain GND or the ground symbol.
Walter
From:
ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2016 8:04 AM
To: IBIS-Interconnect
<ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [ibis-interconn] Re: I agree with Arpad, that we should start by
assuming my introductory language and see if it works ...
All,
The enclosed document lists all lines (or paragraphs) that contain the string
GND. I eliminated occurrences of "[GND ...]" and "GND Pulse ...". The (n): at
the beginning of each line is an artifact of the way I did this extraction, but
us useful to identify each GND occurrence.
This does not include GND in graphics and the ground symbol in graphics. Most
of these are resolved by changing the ground symbol to GND and interpreting
them as signal_names.
There are other things we need to look at carefully (like A_GND),
Walter
From: Walter Katz [mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 7:10 AM
To: 'IBIS-Interconnect'
<ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: I agree with Arpad, that we should start by assuming my introductory
language and see if it works ...
All,
To all, a Happy New Year.
I do agree with Arpad's comment in the minutes of the last meeting:
- Arpad: It seems that Walter's proposal was an attempt to define a general rule
at the outset that could allow us to resolve many issues with one
statement.
- I'm beginning to wonder if it is going to work that way.
- Perhaps we would be better off to start reading the document sentence by
sentence and hashing out the details for each necessary change. Then, as we
are doing that, if we run into something that could be generalized up front
we can add an upfront statement.
- Right now it seems that we've spent two meetings trying to tackle the
generalized concept and still have confusion and or disagreement.
Walter
Walter Katz
wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Phone 303.449-2308
Mobile 303.335-6156
