Arpad-You ask a good question, but I'm not sure there's a good answer. I suggest that we wait until we have some experience which is relevant to your question before we attempt to state an answer.
"Better to remain silent and let the World think you a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
I think this is one of those times. Mike S. On 10/03/2011 10:51 AM, Muranyi, Arpad wrote:
I would like to ask a question before I write a BIRD for spelling out the rule that samples_per_bit is determined by the EDA tool and the AMI model has to be able to handle ANY sapling rate the tool decides to use. Aside from "bad" models which were clearly developed in an inferior manner, what if there is a real need to limit the minimum or maximum samples_per_bit for some valid and justifiable technical reasons? I know the model could have a sample rate converter to accommodate some of those needs, but this adds an overhead to the execution time. What if the model maker wants a super efficient algorithm to be able to go to extremely low BER results? Etc... I feel that leaving the determination of the sampling rate entirely up to the EDA tool may not always work and that we need to have a way for the model to let the EDA tool know what the limits for samples_per_bit are. Comments? Thanks, Arpad ======================================================= 1�+���+^��i��0��Z��?�������f����u�p�����i����y�h�m�����y�b��(��������+�:.�˛���m��֧zf��:"n+&i���z�_�祊�l�����rۧ���r��e===