[bksvol-discuss] Re: A Temporary Solution

  • From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:44:03 -0600

Hi Monica,

Well, another point which you have not considered is that the system would 
give the volunteer credit for those missing pages, credit of $2.50.  I know 
it could be programmed so this would not happen, but it seems like a "big 
fix" for a small problem, if we are allowed to keep on doing as we have been 
doing.

Sue S.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Monica Willyard
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:28 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] A Temporary Solution


Hi everyone. I've been thinking about Julie Carpenter's post all night. It 
has really bothered me because while she is correct about copyright law, 
Bookshare's existing tools and their words seem so out of touch with what we 
need to do to get books proofread. I think I have a temporary solution, the 
equivalent of a band-aid. It should satisfy Bookshare. Will it work for us 
volunteers too? You'll need to decide if it's worth doing.

Under the new site where we do things now, the submitter cannot download her 
book to do anything to it once it's in the proofreading queue. She can't 
replaced garbled or missing pages, even if it would take just a minute or 
two. Nor can a third volunteer supply missing pages for a proofreader using 
the Bookshare site itself. That's why missing pages are usually emailed. How 
would it be if the submitter rescanned the missing content and submitted it 
as if it were a book, putting a hold for the proofreader in the title. It 
could be titled something like "Hold for Monica Missing Pages." I would know 
to get that file and insert its contents into the book I'm working on. Then 
I'd reject the submitted file that contains only the missing pages.

The big downside here is that the proofreader must have an open slot on 
his/her queue to be able to download the file of missing pages. So it would 
take some deliberate planning, and people would need to really respect the 
holds on files so that someone's missing pages don't just disappear.

This might make a little extra work for the staff, but we'd be following 
Bookshare's policies. It would definitely make more work for us, and that's 
why I say it's a temporary solution. It's a band-aid, not a permanent 
answer. We would need to advocate for the Bookshare developers to fix the 
site to let the submitter or another volunteer add missing content legally 
without creating a fake book. It can be done if the staff is willing to make 
it happen. The technology exists, so it's not like asking Bookshare to build 
a new site. They'd just need to change a module of code, not the entire 
framework.

How do you feel about this solution? Is it worth a try?

Monica Willyard
Check out my books and accessible book lists on Goodreads at
http://www.goodreads.com/profile/plumlipstick



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2720 - Release Date: 03/03/10 
01:34:00

Other related posts: