[ddots-l] Re: Meters reading in CT5
- From: "Shawn Brock" <shawnbrock@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:53:17 -0400
right on man! i hope we do to! if things like this had ben fixt i would have
probably upgraded to 5 myself. but with the same old problems plus not beeing
able to scrub i'm glad i stuck it out with 4. some of this stuff is just crazy
not beeing able to scrub? man, come on! but then i will probably not ever
upgrade to 6 either. with all the hassle jaws givs you with the internet
lysonsing and so on its just not worth it. its hard to get some one on the
phone over there who knows what the hell you are talking about! things didnt
allways bee like this. i mean come on, i'm running a computer strickly for
audio, i have custamers who expect there files to bee there whin they come back
to record and for my p c to work like it should! so no freadom scientiffic i
wont put this sucker online. oh..well.. i'm just one person so what does it
matter in this case. it just seems like the audio guy gets screwed by sonar,
and the blind person gets the same from freadom scientiffic. all i can sey is
either there is some magic words to make the audio meaders work that i dont
know, or they just plane suck! i'm guessing that its the latter. folks who
can play there own instraments are the ones who loos here. but what can ya do?
just work with midi i guess.
Shawn Brock
Cincinnati Sound Lab
130 East Sixth Street
Cincinnati Oh.
45202
Phone: 513-349-8541
Web Site:
www.cincysoundlab.com
----- Original Message -----
From: HF
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:37 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Meters reading in CT5
Or bang your head against the wall, which ever is more productive at the
time...
Sometimes I can't decide which.
Let us know if they are reading correctly for you?
Do they make sense, I've almost given up on meters because sometimes they
don't give me levels that are incongruent to what I'm hearing. Examples, a
vocal that is loud should not be at minus 80. I don't know much, but minus 80
should be barely audible. Now to make things more confusing, that same minus
80, on the next day will give me a range between minus 10 and minus 2, which is
more in line with what I hear.
Hopefully we'll get better meter reading in Sonar 6.
HF
----- Original Message -----
From: Studio Montebello
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:14 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Meters reading in CT5
Hi HF!
That sure did it! The lock peak was not clicked.
Thanks very much, everything works properly now. Guess it pays to read the
manual once in a while!
Jean
----- Original Message -----
From: HF
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Meters reading in CT5
Jean
It's not just you.
Go through Section 26 in the CT manual. It'll help.
You might have to do some of the procedures a couple of times.
But mostly you have to make sure that four things are checked in each
meter submenu.
HF
----- Original Message -----
From: Studio Montebello
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 3:38 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Meters reading in CT5
Hello Everyone!
Has anybody had success in reliably reading the peak audio meters in CT
5?
Just installed version 5.1 and thought that this would fix the problem,
but it didn't!
Sometimes it works, but most of the time I get a message to the effect
that no audio has been recorded!
Is this only happening to me?
Jean
Please visit my Web site at: www.studiomontebello.com
Other related posts:
