[duxuser] Re: SGML/ICADD files from APH Repository

  • From: "David P. ROSENFELD" <drosenfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:52:26 -0400

Hello.

I have noticed that it is sometimes best to over-ride the default import type 
for a given file, particularly if its contents contain a slightly nonstandard 
form of HTML formatting commands.  In this situation, DBT will typically decide 
that the file is best characterized as formatted text, but better results can 
sometimes be obtained by taking advantage of whatever  HTML-like formatting 
there is.  



David Rosenfeld, City of Toronto


>>> info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 09/11/02 09:35am >>>
Hi Steve,
 
In many ways, I'm relieved this is not specifically a DBT problem.
 
However I wonder if it would be worth dropping a line to APH explaining the 
difficulties you have faced with such inconstancies?  They may well be aware of 
the problems, but it surely can't do any harm to add your comments?
 
George Bell
Techno-Vision Systems Ltd 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Wasserman [mailto:swasserman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 11 September 2002 13:55
To: 'duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' 
Subject: [duxuser] Re: SGML/ICADD files from APH Repository


I think Warren hit the nail on the head. We have downloaded 4 different files 
recently, and gotten 4 different tag lists, and three separate file formats 
(even though all 4 books were in the same literature series). Two of the files 
were identified by duxbury as SMGL/ICADD files, one imported as a text file, 
and the other as a Word Document. The Word document contained bold & italic 
text, though it did not use any styles, and had a lot of "&" codes. The others 
had SMGL style tags, but were anything but standard, some imported into duxbury 
styles, others turned into unrecognized tags. I've managed to get tolerable 
braille from them by writing Word macros and doing search & replace in Duxbury, 
but it is FAR FAR From "automatic". Apparently it's not anything we're doing 
wrong with Duxbury though, so we'll just have to deal with it.
 
Thanks for providing the interesting and enlightening discussion.
Steven Wasserman
Technology Coordinator
Minnesota State Academy for the Blind
  

-----Original Message-----
From: George Bell [mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:42 AM
To: duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [duxuser] Re: SGML/ICADD files from APH Repository


Hi,
 
Is it possible to obtain a URL for, and details of, specific problematical 
tagged files?
 
Alternative, could we please have an example file mailed as an attachment?  ( 
mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
 
We really do need some live material for testing.
 
George Bell
Techno-Vision Systems Ltd 

-----Original Message-----
From: WarrenDFig@xxxxxxx [mailto:WarrenDFig@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: 05 September 2002 18:40
To: duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [duxuser] Re: SGML/ICADD files from APH Repository


The files in the APH File repository are tagged files and there is no guarantee 
that they are genuine anything--XML, HTML, SGML, ICAAD. They are what the 
publishers have submitted.

Warren






* * *
* This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org.
* To unsubscribe, send a blank message with
*   unsubscribe
* as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also
* subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription
* options by visiting //www.freelists.org.  The list archive
* is also located there.
* Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com
* * *

Other related posts: