[ibis-macro] Re: Question on seeting the EMD direction

  • From: Scott McMorrow <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bradb@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:28:47 -0400

Actually, for audio systems, the time variant behavior of a capacitor is extremely important. Capacitors that do not have good structural integrity exhibit microphonics in an audio system.



Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
121 North River Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882
(401) 284-1827 Business
(401) 284-1840 Fax

http://www.teraspeed.com

Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC



Brad Brim wrote:
Is a decoupling capacitor on a board LTI?  Most of us would answer "yes".
However, capacitors vary with temperature to imply time variance. Capacitors also vary with DC bias voltage, which implies an underlying large signal nonlinear behavior. Capacitors vary with age, again implying time variance. Seems to me the issue was expressed quite well in the last meeting as one of "time constant" and what we wish to consider in analyses. The time constant of signals is picoseconds or nanoseconds. What time constant bounds do we wish to consider in our analyses? If it's on the order of temperature variations, then temperature certainly becomes a time varying parameter. Do we believe it will be required in the foreseeable future to consider passive interconnect as time varying or nonlinear in our system/channel/component analyses with this time constant issue being fully considered? If not, then temperature, bias voltage and other such parameters become higher level discrete state controls rather than low level continuous parameters? regards,
 -Brad
Brad Brim
Sigrity, Inc.
4675 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 130
Santa Clara, CA  95051
408-260-9344 ext 147
503-628-6230 (alternate)
503-799-9917 (mobile)
bradb@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bradb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Muranyi, Arpad
    *Sent:* Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:02 PM
    *To:* IBIS-ATM
    *Subject:* [ibis-macro] Re: Question on seeting the EMD direction

    In our recent discussions on Interconnect-SPICE and our last
    IBIS-ATM teleconference the question was raised whether we can
    safely assume interconnects are LTI.  Scott's message below
    (from a different thread) seems to indicate that there are
    situations when this may not be the case.  This makes me
    nervous about writing a specification that by its definition
    would disallow those effects to be simulated...  Any comments?
Arpad
    ===============================================================

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
    *Sent:* Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:03 PM
    *To:* Muranyi, Arpad
    *Cc:* twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx; msteinb@xxxxxxxxxx; wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx;
    huangchunxing@xxxxxxxxxx; IBIS-ATM; guantao@xxxxxxxxxx
    *Subject:* Re: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-AMI

    Arpad

    I agree with you, and would add that even the analog network
    characterization portion of a passive interconnect system is not a
    well understood topic.  Several issues come to mind:

        * Time variance of the interconnect due to:
              o Temperature
              o Humidity
              o Mechanical Vibration (think twin-ax cables in a vehicle)
        * Equalizer training in the presence of crosstalk and noise
          spikes in a hot-plug environment

    But heck, I'd settle for an IBIS-AMI model that correlates with
    something that can actually be measured.

    Scott

    Scott McMorrow
    Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
    121 North River Drive
    Narragansett, RI 02882
    (401) 284-1827 Business
    (401) 284-1840 Fax

    http://www.teraspeed.com

    Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of
    Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC


    Muranyi, Arpad wrote:
    Sorry to everyone for arguing a little on what has
    been stated so far.  I tend to disagree with the
    statement(s) that the analog corner modeling is
    a well understood topic.

    Just because it is common practice to use high/low
    supply voltages with low/high temperatures, etc...
    to achieve best/worst timings, it doesn't mean that
    this practice actually gives the best/worst timings.
    Having done large amounts of parameter sweeps while I
    was working for my previous employer, I saw solution
    space plots which had failing islands corresponding
    to "in-between" parameter values, and not at the
    extremes.

    The answer then was that we do not know where the
    system is failing unless we simulate all possible
    combinations of parameter values.  That's when the
    frequency domain (resonance) analysis, sensitivity
    analysis, design of experiments (DOE) and similar
    techniques became popular.  I tend to believe that
    the application of statistical analysis techniques
    is a natural continuation of this evolution, as
    kind of an attempt to reduce the amount of time it
    takes to go through all possible parameter combinations...

    My $ 0.02 worth...

    Arpad
    ===========================================================

    -----Original Message-----
    From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Todd Westerhoff
    Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:00 PM
    To: msteinb@xxxxxxxxxx; scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Cc: wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx; huangchunxing@xxxxxxxxxx; 'IBIS-ATM';
    guantao@xxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-AMI

    It's worth pointing out an IBIS-AMI model actually has two models -

    - the analog model in the .ibs file, and
    - the algorithmic model pointed to by the .ibs file

    IBIS-AMI analysis separates analysis of a link into two stages - network
    characterization and link
    analysis.  The analog model is used for the former, while the
    algorithmic model is used for the
latter.
    When we talk about modeling PVT variation, it's worth considering how
    PVT affects each type of model
    separately.  Modeling the effects of PVT on a transmitter's output stage
    or a receiver's input stage
    is well understood (it's what IBIS has been doing for years), while
    modeling the effects of PVT on
    equalization behavior is [relatively] new ground.  I agree this is
    something we should consider
    standardizing, and I also agree that we need more experience in this
    area before it makes sense to
    try & put such standards in place.

    Todd.

    Todd Westerhoff
    VP, Software Products
    SiSoft
    6 Clock Tower Place, Suite 250
    Maynard, MA 01754
    (978) 461-0449 x24
    twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx
    www.sisoft.com


Other related posts: