Walter you would be incorrect. "Lumped approximations between TxTerm/TxPad and RxTerm/RxPad do not hold" A simulation based upon your assumption would have large errors. Scott On 5/27/2010 6:31 PM, Walter Katz wrote:
Scot, I think a better picture is:TxTerm --- TxDie --- TxBump -- TxPkg -- channel -- RxPkg -- RxBump -- RxDie --- RxTerm| | | | TxPad RxPad Walter Walter Katz 303.449-2308 Mobile 720.333-1107 wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx www.sisoft.com -----Original Message----- *From:* Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:25 PM *To:* Walter Katz *Cc:* IBIS-ATM*Subject:* Re: [ibis-macro] another silly IBIS-AMI question about deriving the impulse response of a channelWalter,You are misinterpreting my picture. I was showing the network of just a Tx or Rx. When I say "network" I truly mean a circuit network. Let me create a better picture of the entire channel.TxTerm --- TxDie --- TxBump -- TxPkg -- channel -- RxPkg -- RxBump -- RxDie --- RxTerm| | | |TxPad RxPadFor a 50 ohm single-ended channel TxTerm = 50 ohm RxTerm = 50 ohm TxPad = some high impedance RxPad = some high impedance Lumped approximations between TxTerm/TxPad and RxTerm/RxPad do not hold What I was showing was just one part of the total channel. (50 ohm)RxBump --- Network --- RxTerm (50 ohm) | | RxPad (10k ohm)
-- Scott McMorrow Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC 121 North River Drive Narragansett, RI 02882 (401) 284-1827 Business (401) 284-1840 Fax http://www.teraspeed.com Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC