[bksvol-discuss] Re: 550 books in the download queue
- From: "robert tweedy" <rtweedy2@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:23:38 -0500
I usually checked the books based on how the top of the page does, for
example I just submitted calder pride by Janet dailey but the left side of
the page had a lot of errors in the author's name and the page number, the
text of each page was perfect though. Based on that, I put good because of
the top of the pages but all the pages are there though. Now I am starting
the lucky series by Jackie Collins and ame doing Lady Boss and open book is
saying 5 5 instead of boss because I guess the s looks like a five in some
cages but the numbers of the pages atre showing up. If anyone can help me
get the rest of the lucky series, and the calder series, I would appreciate
it due to the fact I might be waiting on the rest of the series. I do have
THIS CALDER GRASS, I think.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarah Van Oosterwijck" <curiousentity@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:48 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: 550 books in the download queue
> I am pretty sure that book quality is not checked at all by the automated
> checker before a submitted book hits the download page. the rating seems
to
> be the submitter's choice at that point. I don't think it would be a bad
> thing if the automated check did take place at that point, since
submitters
> could still give their opinion in the comment field.
>
> I decide whether to be the validator of a book based on three things: my
> interest in the toppic of the book, which I can't determine if there is no
> synopsis and category selections, the books quality rating, and whether
the
> submitter added comments about the book. If it was entirely left to me
> nothing without all the fields filled out would get a chance at
validation,
> so people should make an effort to give as much info as possible. If they
> didn't care about that info, they probably didn't care about the book
> either, so it could be in any condition.
>
> I also have downloaded books just to find that I really don't know if they
> are okay, because they are weird in some way, so I don't want to be the
> final judge. I don't know what can be done about those books.
>
> Sarah Van Oosterwijck
> curious entity at earthlink dot net
>
>
Other related posts:
