In spite of the repeated please from several of us, I keep finding glib or useless short synopsis in recent submissions. Quite frankly I do not understand which part of the word USEFUL some volunteers have a problem comprehending. In particular, in today's fresh crop of glib contributions I see The Golden Cup by Delva Plain, anonymously submitted by a "Bookshare Volunteer", whose short synopsis proudly states: Fiction by best-selling author. Another title, Holding Out by Ann O'Falk was submitted by 'Louise' and bears the totally useless short description: "see long synopsis". In both cases, a meaningful long description is available for these books. Is there any reason why a shorter version of these descriptions was not inserted in the short description field? Book submitters should ensure that their own submissions include meaning ful short descriptions. Reviewers should catch omitted or meaningless short descriptions and repair them appropriately. Ultimately please remember that we volunteers are performing a service for our customers, who deserve the best fruit of our efforts. I must conclude with a recommendation to the Bookshare staff that all further reviewed/approved books containing trivial short descriptions be routinely rejected by the administrator. Thank you for listening, Guido Guido D. Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. IBM Research, Phone: (512) 838-9735 Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at: http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html