Agreed, those are even worse offenders. By the way, I too have been guilty in olden days of supplying missing, unhelpful, or otherwise glib book information. So, I am the first one to take my own criticism. Guido Guido D. Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. IBM Research, Phone: (512) 838-9735 Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at: http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html Pam Quinn <quinns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 04/28/2004 01:57 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fiction By Best Selling Author & See Long Synopsis I agree that there should be a meaningful short synopsis, but even if there isn't and someone really wants to know what it's about, they can look at the long synopsis which would hopefully be there. How about stepping back a bit and worrying about the books that don't contain a synopsis at all, short or long, before quibbling with the short ones. And in any case, to reject a book because of the lack of a synopsis would be taking it much too far. Hopefully the books will contain the desired synopsis, but if not, the validator is perfectly free to remedy the situation. Pam