[bksvol-discuss] Re: Pearl by Tabitha King
- From: Carrie Karnos <ckarnos@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
I changed the book rating from excellent to good when I approved it because
there are some junk characters on some pages (like the very last page in the
book). If there were just a few junk characters, I'd leave it as excellent. If
there were loads, I'd return it for more editing. This book was right on the
fence. So my question to the group is: what do you want me to do when a book
has some junk characters, more than a few but less than loads? The choices are:
1) leave it as excellent
2) return it for more editing
3) change the rating to good
Have I missed another option?
What's your vote?
Thanks! Carrie
----- Original Message ----
From: Amber Wallenstein <amber.wallens@xxxxxxxxx>
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2008 8:03:40 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Pearl by Tabitha King
Hi all:
Did anyone on this list validate Pearl by Tabitha
King? I worked really hard on it, and I noticed it had a "good" rating,
instead of an "excellent" rating. Does anyone know why? I always want to
improve my scans and I'm baffled why this gets a "good" rating. It has a
lot of dialogue but that's all I can think of.
Thanks.
Amber
Book blog:
http://community.livejournal.com/book_cuddler/
I
have accepted a seat in the House of Representatives, and thereby have
consented
to my own ruin, to your ruin, and to the ruin of our children. I give
you
this warning that you may prepare your mind for your fate.
John
Adams
E-Mail: amber.wallens@xxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
