[bksvol-discuss] Re: Pearl by Tabitha King
- From: "Bob" <rwiley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:49:39 -0500
Sorry Amber, I did not validate Pearl. However, I recently validated a book
that got a good rating and I knew it deserved an excellent rating. There was a
lot of slang in this book also.
A relatively new validator might be shy about arguing with the automated tools,
but they aren't perfect.
It's up to those of us who validate to correct the validator when it tries to
give a good rating to a book that is, in actuality, excellent.
Just guessing about this though.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Amber Wallenstein
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 5:03 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Pearl by Tabitha King
Hi all:
Did anyone on this list validate Pearl by Tabitha King? I worked really hard
on it, and I noticed it had a "good" rating, instead of an "excellent" rating.
Does anyone know why? I always want to improve my scans and I'm baffled why
this gets a "good" rating. It has a lot of dialogue but that's all I can think
of.
Thanks.
Amber
Book blog:
http://community.livejournal.com/book_cuddler/
I have accepted a seat in the House of Representatives, and thereby have
consented to my own ruin, to your ruin, and to the ruin of our children. I give
you this warning that you may prepare your mind for your fate.
John Adams
E-Mail: amber.wallens@xxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1594 - Release Date: 8/5/2008
9:49 PM
Other related posts:
