[bksvol-discuss] Re: Pearl by Tabitha King

  • From: Laura Ann <agape.wellness.massage@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:11:03 -0500

Return it for more editing is my vote.
Your notes are great for knowing how to fix it and make it an excellent quality.

Laura Ann
At 05:10 PM 8/7/2008, you wrote:
I changed the book rating from excellent to good when I approved it because there are some junk characters on some pages (like the very last page in the book). If there were just a few junk characters, I'd leave it as excellent. If there were loads, I'd return it for more editing. This book was right on the fence. So my question to the group is: what do you want me to do when a book has some junk characters, more than a few but less than loads? The choices are:
1) leave it as excellent
2) return it for more editing
3) change the rating to good
Have I missed another option?
What's your vote?

Thanks!  Carrie

----- Original Message ----
From: Amber Wallenstein <amber.wallens@xxxxxxxxx>
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2008 8:03:40 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Pearl by Tabitha King

Hi all:
Did anyone on this list validate Pearl by Tabitha King? I worked really hard on it, and I noticed it had a "good" rating, instead of an "excellent" rating. Does anyone know why? I always want to improve my scans and I'm baffled why this gets a "good" rating. It has a lot of dialogue but that's all I can think of.
Thanks.
Amber
Book blog:
<http://community.livejournal.com/book_cuddler/>http://community.livejournal.com/book_cuddler/
I have accepted a seat in the House of Representatives, and thereby have consented to my own ruin, to your ruin, and to the ruin of our children. I give
you this warning that you may prepare your mind for your fate.
John Adams
E-Mail: <mailto:amber.wallens@xxxxxxxxx>amber.wallens@xxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: