[bksvol-discuss] Re: 550 books in the download queue

  • From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:25:21 -0500

Kenneth,  fixing pagination is not rocket science.  And if you still have 
the original at hand you can easily insert whatever pages are missing. 
Sorry,  but being blind is no excuse.

G.


Guido D. Corona
IBM Accessibility Center,  Austin Tx.
IBM Research,
Phone:  (512) 838-9735
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx

Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html





"Kenneth A. Cross" <crossk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
08/10/2004 05:38 PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss


To
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: 550 books in the download queue






In almost every book I have scanned, which is about a thousand, I have
rarely found the pagination quite that exact.  First, pictures are 
inserted,
sometimes on un-numbered pages.  Also, some pages, such as charts and
graphs, are either un-numbered of just plain missing.  Suppose I get a
two-thousand page book from a library and scan it perfectly, but miss one
index page.  Do you really want that book trashed?  We are not talking 
about
simple issues here.  We are talking about a group of people, I mean us, 
who
have spent most of our lives without immediate access to current books,
however bad the form.  Let's not give that up in search of perfection.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:18 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: 550 books in the download queue


> Search for page numbers as in 79 followed by 80 etc. until you go 
through
> the book's page numbers.  It sounds like a lot of work but really does 
not
> take much time.
>
> E.
> At 03:55 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote:
> >I've hesitated in offering my services in validating due to my concern
> >(perhaps unwarranted) that I couldn't do the maticulous job some of yu
> >obviously do based on the books I routinely read from BookShare.
> >
> >At this point, I've not purchased any of the fancy ocr packages such as
> >k100 or Open Book which would make reviewing submissions a relative
> >breeze.  In reviwing the outlined tasks involved in validating, the
> >stickler would be the one concerning making certain that the text is
> >incomplete form and no pages are mmissing.  Other than reading the 
entire
> >book, how would one go about this task without a program such as K100
> >which seems more and more impressive every time you folks discuss it?
> >
> >
>
>
>
>



Other related posts: