Hi.
Maybe I did not spoke well, but.
I never spoken about behaviour of bowing to one another between victim and
perpetrator.
When we eats something, it's our stomach who does digestion. Not the food.
The food (victim) serve the man (perpetrator). Not contrary.
The problem is, when the victim stays in question "Why? Why me?...".
Like food screaming because is being eat... ...
This is a role of victimization.
And the right question is: "For what?"
The movement is always to promote an encounter.
One, justify the other.
In the flow of love, there is no why(?).
There is always, a movement to restore the flow between connections, by
love. And there's important to know who is in each connection.
Maybe we don't know where is the source. Well. The Constellation serves for
this.
The food never ask stomach about digestion. It serves stomach through the
digestion
But digestion knows what stomach must to do.
And, he knows. Too.
Around this theme there's a lot to do.
Thanks for your attention.
Luís.
2010/4/13 Kay Needham <familyconstellationinfo@xxxxxxxxx>
Hello Stephen and all,
I would like to add that the facing of victim to perpetrator and the
behaviour of bowing to one another is not actually what is happening here,
in FC. Who gets what from these positions is also an unnecessary
consideration. Our sympathies arise because our awareness in these moments
is not attuned to the presence of life force, alone and untampered with.
When vicims bow to perpetrators or vica versa their symbolic gesture towards
each other is representative of both bowing down to life. Bowing down to
something that is higher, bigger and greater than themselves, not each
other. In this way the movement is able to transcend behaviour/biology and
survival. The unconscious intention "to get" anything from these movements,
immediately restricts soul movement. When conscious bowing happens both give
unconditionally, respect for life. The focus to take disappears and love and
sameness abides in presence.
In this way the Orders of Love are not only born out of biological survival
impulses.
Kind regards
Sadhana
----- Original Message ----
From: Stephen Campbell <coachuno@xxxxxxxxx <coachuno%40gmail.com>>
To: ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wed, April 14, 2010 12:23:32 AM
Subject: Re: [ConstellationTalk] Orders of Love revisited
Luis,
Thank you for your clarification and your amplification. I very much like
your take that it is the victim who takes the lead. I see this as a pathway
to stepping out of the victim role. And I agree with you that we tend to
sympathize with the victim for at one time or another, most probably in
early childhood, we have felt or experienced the role of a victim in real
life situations. Your note that whether the perpetrator accepts or not is
his concern and not the victim's. It is brilliant when it happens but it
does not necessarily have to be so for the victim to be released to a more
harmonious state of being.
Fondly,
Stephen
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Luís Viegas Moreira
tlm. 919 744 249
web. www.odespertardoeu.blogspot.com
Skype. luismvm1
FaceBook. Luís Miguel Viegas Moreira
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
