[ddots-l] Re: New synth
- From: clarence griffin <goldfingas@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:08:59 -0400
Yeah, I am just looking for something that is maybe along the same lines as the
ion. I have an ion, but I would rather use software.
GF
Goldfinga Productions
Phone: 757-412-5494
Follow me on twitter
http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Gordon Kent wrote:
> Hypersonic is ok but it really is kind of cheap sounding and it is a bitch to
> program in the synth rack because every channel has hundreds of parameters.
> If you use it as a multi timbral synth, you need to program every channel you
> use to get at its paramnetersl. And it really only has a few good sounds
> that reallly easure up in my oppinion.
> Gord
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Omar Binno
> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 10:31 PM
> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: New synth
>
> Although I've never done it, I've heard that hypersonic's parameters are
> accessible. I'm not sure if you can get as extensive with it as you're
> looking for, but I have heard from several blind users that its parameters
> are quite accessible. I've messed with its fx very minimally, and they're
> definitely accessible, but never messed around with or probed its oscillators.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: clarence griffin
> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 10:23 PM
> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: New synth
>
> I mean an analog soft synth. I want one with like 3 oscillators and a couple
> filters, maybe some fx, although I can patch fx in my self. I want to make
> some nice thick bass sounds and cool leads. maybe something with an arp on it?
>
> GF
>
> Goldfinga Productions
> Phone: 757-412-5494
>
> Follow me on twitter
> http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
>
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Omar Binno wrote:
>
>> Do you mean using third party samples, or do you mean having a synth with
>> sounds that you would have tweaking access to the way we do with the motif?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: clarence griffin
>> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 10:00 PM
>> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: New synth
>>
>> but I want to build my own sounds, what's a good synth for that?
>>
>> GF
>>
>> Goldfinga Productions
>> Phone: 757-412-5494
>>
>> Follow me on twitter
>> http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 14, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Omar Binno wrote:
>>
>>> I really like hypersonic 2 for analog and synth stuff.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: clarence griffin
>>> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 9:56 PM
>>> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: New synth
>>>
>>> I need to find a nice one to use so I can throw all the others away, I
>>> don't even know what I have for analog with sonar right now. does anything
>>> come with sonar by default?
>>>
>>> GF
>>>
>>> Goldfinga Productions
>>> Phone: 757-412-5494
>>>
>>> Follow me on twitter
>>> http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 14, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Bryan Smart wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yep. Virtual analog has been so done to death that we've already heard as
>>> > good as it is going to get for many years, if ever. People should
>>> > give up and make something new.
>>> >
>>> > The real reason that we get so many of those type of synth plugs is
>>> > because they're cheap as crap to produce. Anything sample based requires
>>> > either producing your own sample library (which is very expensive), or
>>> > else licensing samples from someone else (which is still expensive for
>>> > anything quality). Many of the companies that have been doing sampling
>>> > professionally for the longest, and do it the best (like the big 3:
>>> > Yamaha, Korg, and Roland), won't license their material to you under any
>>> > terms or at any cost.
>>> >
>>> > Its so easy to just throw together another synth that uses
>>> > computationally produced sounds, with a slightly different interface for
>>> > controlling how it all works. Most of the code for doing all of that
>>> > (generating waveforms, digital signal processing, simple effects
>>> > algorithms) is already public domain, so bedroom software companies can
>>> > slap a lot of existing building blocks together, put a UI on it, and
>>> > start selling. If you're one of those guys, the only way you get noticed
>>> > in the big sea of options is to pay for promotion, like paying Cakewalk
>>> > to be featured in their news letter so to get you visibility and some
>>> > perceived cred.
>>> >
>>> > If you all have money to spend, go buy the new sample packs for Dimension
>>> > Pro. At least those won't sound like synths that you already have, and
>>> > with CakeTalking, you'll be able to edit those presets (good luck
>>> > with accessibility of this new synth).
>>> >
>>> > Bryan
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> > On Behalf Of D!J!X!
>>> > Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 6:24 PM
>>> > To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Subject: [ddots-l] Re: New synth
>>> >
>>> > Lol! Nice post man... It's something I've wondered for a while, why do
>>> > companies insist in reproducing the sounds of the old stuff, (yeah it's
>>> > sounds cool and some of those sounds are awesome), but can we sort of
>>> > focus on making new stuff, using all this computer power to make
>>> > something different, as oppose to trying to accurately reproduce every
>>> > ocilator and technology of the hardware stuff? Hardware is hardware,
>>> > software is software; some of the factors of those old synths can not be
>>> > reproduced, there's just that factor of electronics and circuits that
>>> > change so randomly and depending on so many different factors that....
>>> > It's kind of a waste of time... I'd rather have a completely digital
>>> > synth that focuses on that realm and does it well, instead of trying to
>>> > imitate/reproduce 10 different synths from the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's,
>>> > etc...
>>> >
>>> > D!J!X!
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> > On Behalf Of Bryan Smart
>>> > Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 12:30 AM
>>> > To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Subject: [ddots-l] Re: New synth
>>> >
>>> > Doubt it.
>>> >
>>> > That blerb didn't excite me too much. Yawn.
>>> >
>>> > Anywhere, USA - for immediate release.
>>> >
>>> > YetAnotherCompany.com releases world's 10,000th virtual analog modeling
>>> > softsynth. The new mega supreme Analog Destroyer X hybrid wavetable
>>> > modeling softsynth has all of the features that you've been missing in
>>> > the other 9999 virtual analog softsynths you already own, like flashy new
>>> > graphics, 100 banks of unusable factory default presets made by
>>> > supposedly famous electronic music artists from MySpace, and includes our
>>> > new obscuretech modeling engine.
>>> >
>>> > Many virtual analog softsynths model the actual circuits of your favorite
>>> > classic synths. However, the new obscuretech (TM) modeling engine models
>>> > the frustration of those old marvels. Digital synthesizers have brought
>>> > great new sounds, but always stay so in tune and thin. No more! True
>>> > realism is here with the new Mega Supreme Analog Destroyer X. Every three
>>> > minutes, the main tuning frequency of the Mega Supreme Analog Destroyer X
>>> > synth will automatically drift by a random amount that is based on the
>>> > current temperature of your CPU. This helps to simulate that wonderful
>>> > frequency beating that gave analog synths their character. Also available
>>> > as a VST effects plug-in, the built-in LeakTronic effects processor
>>> > recreates that essential characteristic hiss of amplification, and
>>> > accurately simulates bleed from silent oscillators.
>>> >
>>> > Do away with the clean and sterile sound of your tracks! Waste your time
>>> > like the old pros! Party like its 1979! Order Mega Supreme Analog
>>> > Destroyer X today for only $299. Order now. Download bandwidth is
>>> > limited.
>>> >
>>> > Bryan
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> > On Behalf Of Greg Brayton
>>> > Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 11:52 AM
>>> > To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Subject: [ddots-l] New synth
>>> >
>>> > I got this in a news letter. Just wondering if it's accessible now, or if
>>> > David will be scripting for it or any info any one has reguarding this
>>> > new soft synth.
>>> > The info on the synth is below.
>>> >
>>> > Blurring the lines between hardware and software synths, the FXpansion
>>> > Synth Squad Elite Pack offers incredible synth sounds, without all the
>>> > hassles associated with hardware synths. Perfect for fans of Rapture, the
>>> > FXpansion Synth Squad Elite Pack features three modeled synths-Strobe,
>>> > Amber, and Cypher created from meticulously engineered circuit models and
>>> > designed from the ground up to take all the abuse you can dish out.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
>>> > To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
>>> > If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > and in the Subject line type
>>> > unsubscribe
>>> > For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately
>>> > following link:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectzq or send a message, to
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
>>> > To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>>> > If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > and in the Subject line type
>>> > unsubscribe
>>> > For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately
>>> > following link:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a message, to
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq
>>> >
>>> > PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
>>> > To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>>> > If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > and in the Subject line type
>>> > unsubscribe
>>> > For other list commands such as vacation mode,
>>> > click on the immediately following link:
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
>>> > send a message, to
>>> > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > and in the Subject line type
>>> > faq
>>> >
>>>
>>> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
>>> To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
>>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
>>> If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> and in the Subject line type
>>> unsubscribe
>>> For other list commands such as vacation mode,
>>> click on the immediately following link:
>>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
>>> send a message, to
>>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> and in the Subject line type
>>> faq
>>
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
