Ok, test went well and worked fine, although the only thing I haven’t figured
out is how the caller can hear the output music. Not sure that is vital, but
may be able to yet work out how to do that.
Sarah
From: sfhrock
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 2:17 PM
To: hrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Hastings Rock] Re: Final Night
Andy,
I agree with the local DJ idea as many of us will have been involved for long
time but never have experienced a broadcast quite like this.
I think for the anchors it will be a busy programme as they will control the
guests, playing the music, doing the housekeeping activities and making sure
everything comes together from a technical point of view and effectively
driving the programme along, so they need to be comfortable with that.
Then we will need a list of those who want to be guests. They would need to
pair up with the anchors; probably with those who have a bit of a rapport with
each other to help keep it moving and relaxed.
The only other thing I will say is the anchors would need to keep a tight check
on time. It will be very easy for each guest and hence the segment to overrun
and we do not want that. It would make it stressful for everyone. So the
anchors need to push the guests along if they are talking a bit too much and
the guest's slot is starting to overrun.
With Mumble, it should be possible to have all three guests on together if a
group wanted to do it that way.
I am happy to be a guest.
Simon.
On 24/05/2020 13:05, Andy Gunton wrote:
Ralph: In the password, the O is the capital letter 'O', not the number zero.
That stopped me the first time.
I also think this is a great idea, well done Simon, if we can get it all to
work ok.
I've managed to download & set up the Mumble app, so presumably I'll now be
able to connect to the live DJ?
We're still working on which DJs will be doing the slots, but this will
hopefully enable those DJs who can't be live on the night to get involved,
including those of us who've not been involved at all this year, which is what
I wanted to try & do all along.
I'd like to keep it to local DJs presenting the final night shows if
possible, but of course people like Martin Turner & Ray Copeland could still be
involved via the Mumble app if they wanted to be.
So hopefully 3 x 2 hour slots from 6pm & then play DSOTM around midnight.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Andy
Andy Gunton
Phone: 07545 264247
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: hrock-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:hrock-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf ;
of Ralph mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 24 May 2020 12:02
To: hrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:hrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Hastings Rock] Re: Final Night
Hi Jon. I’m trying to set up mumble on iOS it’s fine until I hit connect. I
then get a message
Connection Rejected
Wrong Server Password
I’ve tried both root.oasw.co.uk and
NmJkZjYzYjA10WYy
Keeps coming back to same message.
Any ideas. Ralph
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 May 2020, at 08:09, sfhrock mailto:sfhrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Yes this is not difficult to install and get running. I have done so
myself. It will eliminate the need to be able to handle telephone calls.
Therefore anyone with a home studio can make use of it if they wish. It should
also be better quality.
Simon.
On 23/05/2020 21:57, hrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Here's the link to the Mumble setup I put together earlier
http://www.oasw.co.uk/mpublic/hrock-bits/2020/mumble-setup.pdf ;
What this does is allows all the dj's to join an audio real time "chat
room". Acts a bit like a telephone conference call.
If you couple this with Simon's idea each "anchor" has the output of this
on their desk and fade can then chat with the dj's who are participating in
their segment.
You'd need people to set this up and test it in advance but everyone can
more or less do that themselves if they follow the instructions. There's no
need to coordinate anything with me it runs alongside the main studio.
On 23 May 2020 21:00:01 BST, Tony Davis mailto:tonydavis210852@xxxxxxxxx ;
wrote:
** Hastings Rock Radio **
Who would anchors be because I’m not sure that anyone other than Sarah
can connect to a phone and we are not testing whether that works or not until
tomorrow. Think we may be over complicating this and perhaps just shorter sets
for djs and, if it works, the possibility of others ringing into Sarah to
present. We are testing tomorrow the possibility of taking in the stream
through messenger.
Tony D
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Ralph
Sent: 23 May 2020 20:23
To: hrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Hastings Rock] Re: Final Night
** Hastings Rock Radio **
Simon THAT. my friend is a cracking idea. I love that.
Thing is I do feel it may be a little complicated to get sorted and
broadcastable inside six days but...................
R
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 May 2020, at 19:46, sfhrock mailto:sfhrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
wrote:
>
> ** Hastings Rock Radio **
>
> How about this for an idea?
>
> The evening is spilt into segments. Just to outline some terminology
to
> make it easier to explain, each segment is hosted by an 'anchor'. The
> criteria for being an anchor is that you can present a programme from
> home and put a phone call on air.
>
> In each segment there are 'guest DJs', say up to three,depending how
> long each segment is.
>
> Each guest DJ presents a set; three or four tracks, could be their
> choice, whatever.
>
> This could be as a straight set so they are left to present down the
> phone with the anchor simply playing the tracks, or in conversation
with
> the anchor, maybe talking about the chosen tracks perhaps or reading
out
> dedications etc.
>
> Each segment is produced by the anchor in conjunction with their guest
> DJs, so it is entirely up to them how they organise the tracks, who is
> saying what etc. That way no one has to try and produce the whole
> evening, which would be a nightmare.
>
> If we had three people that could act as anchors and each had a two
hour
> segment we would get 12 DJs including anchors in the 6 hour slot. If
> there are more that want to be part of it we may have to start
earlier.
> If there are those that would like to do a show on their own without
> guests, than they can but they have much shorter segment.
>
> It sound complicated but if each group produces only their segment,
then
> it should not be too onerous. Also, with each group producing their
own
> segment, the segments will probably each sound slightly different,
which
> would be more interesting to listen to and keep people listening
through
> the evening.
>
> I think just leaving a message on the phone, whilst it is a lot
simpler,
> is not going to sound that special to be honest.
>
> Each group would need to think about how the guests could hear the
track
> playing, unless the anchor is controlling through conversation, but
all
> of that would be up to each group to work out.
>
> Ambitious yes, but it would be a bit different and maybe interesting
to
> listen to?
>
> Simon.
>
>
>> On 22/05/2020 21:20, sfhrock wrote:
>> ** Hastings Rock Radio **
>>
>> The ads could be taken out as I have done for JD's Rock and Roll but
six
>> hours is rather a lot to go through and the programme is usually a
bit
>> chaotic. I don't think it will fit very well with the times either.
It
>> would just remind everyone of what they are missing. Did some of it
come
>> from the Carlisle?
>>
>> Maybe we could have a number of DJs doing short stints rather like
we do
>> anyway on the last Friday, particularly from those who have
contributed
>> this year.
>>
>> I think using Jon's virtual studio facility would work quite well for
>> this and allow a bit more variety of voices. Richard Stack seems to
have
>> mastered it very well. Unsurprisingly a bit shaky at the start but
you
>> would not have any idea he was using it now. He sounds just as good
as
>> anyone.
>>
>> Also, how about asking for dedications? Robojock is Ok but it does
not
>> allow someone to dedicate a song for someone else, friend/loved one -
>> especially good if they are geo isolated from each other at this
time.
>> In fact we could say that any requests we play will only be played if
>> they are dedications to someone else (obviously we would need take
this
>> on trust).
>>
>> For those with home studios with telephone connectivity, other DJs
could
>> contribute by phone though this would need a bit of production,
>> particularly if the idea ran across slots, i.e who was going to
speak to
>> who and at what time to make sure no repetition and as many are
included
>> as possible. They could be invited to choose a few favourites that
they
>> could both talk about? This might be a bit complicated to organise
>> though now I think about it but would be bit different to the norm,
>> which might be a good thing at this time?
>>
>> Just a few ideas?
>>
>> Simon.
>>
>>
>>> On 22/05/2020 20:41, Ralph (Redacted sender ralphwinser for DMARC)
wrote:
>>> ** Hastings Rock Radio **
>>>
>>> Liking the jingle between DJs Jon.
>>> Another thought and by far the easiest option. Play out last years
last night. I guess it’s in the archives I know it’s not the best option
but...... adverts would be a problem I guess.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 22 May 2020, at 19:33, jon bird
mailto:hrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ** Hastings Rock Radio **
>>>>
>>>> Very quickly because I need to be somewhere else (not physically
obviously!).
>>>>
>>>> I've already mentioned the Mumble/voice comms thing as an option
so I
>>>> won't repeat that again here but happy to support setting that up
if
>>>> people want to give that a try.
>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to suggest that we forget the Zoom/video chat idea, as
the
>>>>> slight time lag would make it a problem & we want things to be as
easy as
>>>>> possible.
>>>> Before we dismiss the Zoom thing, it was mentioned about how
listeners
>>>> would be able to see the DJs on this. Of the couple of sesssions
I've been
>>>> involved with it was as a passive viewer - one of several hundred
in fact
>>>> watching 6-8 people on screen. Which is basically what you are
talking
>>>> about here. However I suspect you may have to pay to accomodate
more than
>>>> a few people and/or go over the 40 minute limit but I can't really
help
>>>> any further than that.
>>>>
>>>>> Nick has assured me that we don't need the hour between live DJs,
as long
>>>>> as we make sure they log out & in properly.
>>>>> This should only take minutes, if that, so we could maybe let
Robojock
>>>>> play one track between DJs & then log in at the end of that
track, unless
>>>>> it's a long one!
>>>>> How does that sound? Will that work?
>>>>>
>>>> Re: Tony's point about requests, that's easily done, we'll just
disable
>>>> the request page for the evening. It's only available during
periods when
>>>> we take requests anyway...
>>>>
>>>> Personally I think having Robojock kick in at the end of every
show for
>>>> potentially just a few seconds of a track will be a bit rubbish.
What I
>>>> think you want is a longish (say a minute) jingle/backing track
with a bit
>>>> of a voiceover - a bit like the "please hold, you call is
important to us"
>>>> but more "we're just getting ready for the next show, stand
by....". That
>>>> just runs up until the next DJ connects up - which will hopefully
be
>>>> within seconds of the previous one disconnecting. If not, once the
>>>> announcement track is over, the default would be to drop back to
>>>> automation (eg. presenter having technical difficulties). I can
easily set
>>>> that up, just needs someone to record something suitable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> == mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - in real life jon bird
>>>> == http://www.onasticksoftware.co.uk - stuff, on-a-stick
>>>> == "men love women, women love children, children love hamsters"
>>>> == <technology out of control>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> --
> Simon.
>
>
Virus-free. www.avg.com
--
Via K9Mail on Galaxy S5 Neo
--
Simon.--
Simon.
