Another update. On Wed, February 8, 2006 8:26 pm, Paul Fernando wrote: > It was a minor bug after all. > > On Wed, February 8, 2006 7:56 pm, Muranyi, Arpad wrote: >> One more thing, it seems that the Verilog and VHDL >> sides do the same thing as far as the ordering >> problem goes, I may have gotten confused about that >> when I was rushing to my meeting... >> >> Arpad >> ==================================================== >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Muranyi, Arpad >> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:55 PM >> To: 'prfernan@xxxxxxxx' >> Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update >> >> Paul, >> >> Forgot to mention that in this version I started to see >> messages in the DOS window about "Swapped ... " which >> you should turn off. I am not interested in seeing this >> (seems to be a debug feature you put in there) and it >> sounds a little scary for the novice... >> >> Arpad >> ======================================================== >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Muranyi, Arpad >> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:53 PM >> To: 'prfernan@xxxxxxxx' >> Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update >> >> Paul, >> >> Please try the attached file. Just to reiterate, >> r1 should have the table that has a LOWER Vfixture >> value than the table that goes into r2, and f1 >> should have the table that has a HIGHER Vfixture >> than the table that goes into f2. >> >> Interestingly, when I used the buffers in the lab_1.ibs >> file, the order was correct. From this I suspect that >> your compare does something differently depending on >> whether Vfixture is equal to the supply voltages compared >> when it is something else (which is what this test file >> does). >> >> Thanks, >> >> Arpad >> ====================================================-----Original >> Message----- >> From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf >> Of Paul Fernando >> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 3:57 PM >> To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update >> >> I fixed #2. >> I can't recreate #1. And like you said, its odd that this is happening. >> Could you give >> me a sequence to re-create the condition? >> >