Thanks. <smile> I just moved about two weeks ago and haven't been doing a whole lot of anything Bookshare-related other than reading books from the site. <smile> I need to get my scanner unpacked so I can get started again, huh? Good to be back to reading and participating in list mail again though. Take care. Julie Morales Email and Windows Live/Windows Messenger: inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxx I'm a sales rep for Avon, All Mixed Up Gourmet and Scentsational Delights. Contact me for more info. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jill O'Connell" <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 3:15 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Bookshare & PQ submission Julie, Good to hear your voice on the list again. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julie & Miss Mercy" <mercy421@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:11 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Bookshare & PQ submission > But the PQ books are there to represent the exact copy of the print book, > basically. That's what it is...a digital file, most likely, used to make > the > print books in the first place. I agree that hyphenated words between > pages > are annoying but they're not hard to fix. That's not something I think we > need to spend our volunteers' time on. There are a lot of other books that > need validating that our volunteers could spend their time on. Those books > might actually have scanning errors, where the publisher quality books > wouldn't. Take care. > Julie Morales > Email and Windows Live/Windows Messenger: > inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxx > I'm a sales rep for Avon, All Mixed Up Gourmet and Scentsational Delights. > Contact me for more info. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike and Lori Castner" <mandlcastner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:50 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Bookshare & PQ submission > > > Maybe what we need is validators for PQ books. One of the things I hate > most is words that are hyphenated between lines, and worse yet, between > pages. There may be other things to look for. We want the best reading > experience we can possibly deliver and my example of hyphenation would > certainly detract from any book, including a PQ book. > Mike > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:46 AM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Bookshare & PQ submission > > >> Reading the thread about publisher quality submissions, I thought it was >> worth weighing in with more information. The mission of Bookshare.org >> is to get better access to books to people who cannot effectively access >> print. I know our volunteers support that mission. >> >> I consider the issue of possibly losing quality content, that is, >> something that makes the reader experience better (like picture >> descriptions), is always worth looking at. That's because it ties >> directly to our mission. I hear people worrying about throwing out >> children's picture books with picture descriptions and replacing them >> with publisher-supplied versions. But, I don't think we have any >> children's book publishers providing us with digital content. We're not >> focusing on them, because there isn't a big win there (34 words in a >> kids book is not that hard to get in by typing). We're focusing on >> textbooks and technical books, and getting trade books when we can. >> Scholastic gave us permission to provide their books globally, but >> didn't give us any digital content. So, I think folks should not be >> worrying about a surge of kid's picture books with 34 words in place of >> 34 words plus nice picture descriptions. >> >> The other important part of publishers supplying content is that almost >> all of them provide these global rights that enable us to expand >> Bookshare.org to serve all print disabled people globally. That's >> really important for our mission: many more people need us than live in >> the U.S. Publishers often require us to replace the scanned books with >> the digital books, to minimize the concerns publishers and authors have >> about having errors in their work. This is a big, big concern of >> authors, and we have to acknowledge that as creators of the wonderful >> books we share, we have to respect their concern that their works be >> communicated in the as close to the original quality as possible. Our >> community has benefited from the dedication of our validators to ensure >> these outcomes. >> >> The issue of "throwing away" volunteer work to give the reader a better >> quality book seems like an odd issue. Improved quality content has been >> the number one issue of Bookshare readers when we survey them. It's >> certainly the number one issue of ex-Bookshare.org users, and I take our >> failure to serve them seriously. Our volunteers have always embraced >> making better scans of books. Why does this change when it's the >> publisher volunteering a better version of the book? We wouldn't keep >> the fair version of a scanned book around when it was replaced with an >> excellent scan: we've been throwing them away with our dedication to the >> readers. Plus, the publisher quality books are increasingly coming to >> us with improved navigation options. >> >> Let's be honest: volunteers will continue to be the primary source of >> books for a long time: years and years. 95+% of the books in >> Bookshare.org is there because someone in our volunteer community >> decided it was worth having. If someone complains that a book isn't of >> the quality it says it is, we'll replace it with a better one. That's >> we've decided that if one person in our community thought it was >> important to have, we will invest the money to buy the books and the >> energy to replicate it. >> >> We're here fighting for equality for readers with disabilities. The >> "powers that be" are pretty clear about mission and our entire team >> spends a lot of time trying to figure out the best ways to accomplish >> that mission. My suggestion is that when there are changes (and there >> are going to be a lot of really great changes) to Bookshare.org, that we >> can assume that everybody on the Bookshare.org team, users, volunteers >> and staff, are all trying to accomplish the grand goal: the highest >> quality books at the same time as non-disabled people have them, for the >> same of lower price! >> >> Jim Fruchterman >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >> > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list > of > available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list > of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.523 / Virus Database: 270.6.1/1607 - Release Date: 8/12/2008 > 7:19 AM > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.